Clyde River Action Group | sitemap | log in
|
![]() |
||
|
Your Voice...
quarry I went for a walk down to the village and I looked over to the proposed site for this abomination. It got me thinking that we as a human race do not deserve to own such beauty I had a lump in my throat when I tried to imagine what it was going to look like should planning permission go thru (god forbid!) I have noted my objections to SLC and if anyone can give our tranquil landscape a fighting chance then CRAG can all the best and good luck Posted by jules on 19 January 2010 Fly fishing I've fished the stretch of river shown on your home page for over 15 years. I've had some fantastic days observing wildlife and enjoying the unspoilt nature of the place. The rivers flood plains form a function and alow high volumes of water to be displaced across the landscape thus preventing catastrophic flooding events further downstream. With future weather patterns set to get wetter as a result of climate change then such sites are crucial in lessening flood events, one only has to see what happened recently in Cumbria. I just hope this application does not go through! Posted by m cressey on 15 December 2009 quarry We drive through the area to visit our son, at university in Edinburgh, and see the grand vista of your landscape. We hope you get your wish to stop this ugly intrusion, which would decimate the area, both landscape, environment and livelihoods of many.We live in London so we see much so called "new" ideas and the results. Good luck in your campaign. Peter Posted by Peter and Wilma Davis on 25 November 2009 overton farm quarry What a horrible proposal. From a truly horrible company. Anyone who thinks that this area of the river Clyde is worth destroying for around 20 jobs has a very low level of intelligence. We the people of Scotland deserve more. The guy who praised Patersons in this site should rethink his views. Im afraid that the jobs offered by Patersons does not justify the destruction of an eco system. What a greedy selfish individual he must be to think that is okay, so therefore the quarry should be thrown back in there greedy faces. A recession caused by foolish bank lending does not justify our enviroment being destroyed Posted by james lafferty on 12 October 2009 NO WAY! on 26 August 2009 No Title on 20 August 2009 stop the quarry on 11 August 2009 No Title on 01 August 2009 Living next to a Quarry I lived in Boghead for 12 years, within a few hundred yards of Paterson's quarry, and I can tell you the traffic hammering past every day was terrifying. Our house used to shake! In winter the roads were covered in filth making them slippy and dangerous. In summer windows were coated with dust. The local roads are full of pot-holes and we suffered from several damaged tyres and wheels. Add to that the noise pollution from machinery and reversing trucks, night and day, and you might realise that if this quarry gets the go-ahead life will be very different in our local area. If anyone is in any doubt, try driving from Boghead to Strathaven - the road is a disaster. It's not just about the views and the wildlife - there are many more aspects of life that will be affected and damaged. Posted by Janet on 14 July 2009 Dear Janet, Thank you for taking the time to contact CRAG, it is greatly appreciated. It is very upsetting and worrying to read that you have had to endure problems with your local quarry as you have described. Now that the Overburns application has been lodged with the Council, your experiences could be very helpful to our campaign. If you or any of your friends and neighbours have any further information, photo's etc that would be of interest to us, and are able to pass it on, we would more than happy to receive it. Please keep in touch. CRAG - NO QUARRY Posted by CRAG on 03 August 2009 'Restoration smoke screen' on 21 June 2009 You Tube video on 18 June 2009 Quarry on 11 June 2009 Big Signs - NO on 09 June 2009 Quarry - NO on 23 May 2009 quarry at Lamington on 24 April 2009 Quarry on 24 April 2009 |
|
|
![]() |
||
I wish George could have known.